In this revealing and sad New Yorkerarticle
on David Foster Wallace and his unfinished novel, D. T. Max writes the
following:
Doug Hesse, a colleague, made the mistake of praising an essay of
Wallace’s. “He did this gesture of wiping the butt with one hand and
pointing to his mouth with the other,” Hesse remembers. “I learned
really really quickly not to go beyond the equivalent of ‘How’s the
weather?’ ”
A good rule of thumb when photographing ultimate is always to keep the
disc in the frame, because otherwise it’s just a bunch of clowns running
around on a field:
No chance that a Post-Church Commission CIA hires the protagonist.
Little chance that the SAC who gives Nina a ride drives a Lexus.
All internet sleuthing—very shaky.
The mix-tape that Bobby comes up with.
Confusion about the effects of heavy metal exposure.
The various overt references to Thomas Harris and The X-Files only
highlight the deficiencies in this story-world’s internal coherence,
while apparently intending to do the opposite.
Bobby as a character—his motivation in diegetic terms versus his
obvious narrative function (information dumping).
I ordered this after seeing an intriguing summary in a recent TLS. The
opening scene involves a McDonald’s shoot-’em-up, where there are two
shooters. The older of the two shoots the younger and flees. If I
understood the exposition correctly, no one ever realized, police and
all, that there were two shooters.
If television has taught me anything, it’s that forensic analysis, even
in 1991, would reveal a) that the younger shooter’s death was not
self-inflicted and b) that there were two guns used in the massacre. Now
the TLS article mentioned something about “plutocrat hunter-gatherers”
who are part of some type of serial murdering cult, and that sounds too
sociologically interesting to abandon at this point; but I’m reading
under protest.
Damn unlucky Thames Drains the Spectator. Even the bow-tied
editor Of the Spectator Leaks phlegm. The reactionary
actuaries Of the hibernator Spectator Strut hand-in-hand,
A footpad’s band. Under land Darling Lil— No lace
frill— Hears the snot-nose Of the hibernator Spectator’s
Head investigator And puts on clothes.
I’ve yet to read a convincing explanation of the speaker in this poem,
given Eliot’s political sensibilies, though I’m, as always, open to
suggestions.
I taught Beowulf today, and I think it’s worth noting that the Geatish
martial spirit was, contrary to all visible evidence, apparently being
preserved in Sweden in the late 60s. This CIA
memo mentions
that Sweden, along with India, was one of the countries that might
conceivably develop nuclear weapons in the next few years.
I found the memo on this National Security Archive
exhibit on
the Nuclear Emergency Search Team. Someone from Wilmington tried some
low-enriched uranium extortion in the 70s, for example. (I worked in the
Southport nuclear plant for a few months and was always imagining, in my
administrative building, that something like that was going on at any
given moment.)
Or, at least, on the specific copy of it I got from Verso as a gift for
subscribing (finally) to NLR. The copy they sent me has about a twenty
page interpolation of some type of organizational theory text, different
typography and everything, almost in the middle. I don’t know if I
received the book because they knew it was defective, or if the entire
print run is like this; but I have to admit that I’ve thought about what
it would be like to assign this edition in a class and then pretend as
if the organizational theory text is in fact a Borgesian creation of
Lefebvre’s. I could imagine spending hours puzzling out the implications
of this bold move in seminar.
This promising motto (“A little less ritual and a little more fun”)
comes to courtesy of Spike, the peroxide-blond punk rock vampire in
the 1990s American television series Buffy the Vampire Slayer. Spike
symbolizes the New-Age vampire in modern cinema: young, American,
anti-establishment, ironic, and allergic to boredom.