number found study results group method order groups high made related original comparison considered common significant similar compared approach

0.33 Ulrich Köhler, , Computers and the Humanities, 1976.
0.22 Eleanor Guralnick, The Proportions of Some Archaic Greek Sculptured Figures: A Computer Analysis, Computers and the Humanities, 1976.
0.22 Eric Poole, The Computer in Determining Stemmatic Relationships, Computers and the Humanities, 1974.
0.20 Gift Siromoney Abdul Huq, Segmentation of Indus Texts: A Dynamic Programming Approach, Computers and the Humanities, 1988.
0.20 Nancy M. Ide, A Statistical Measure of Theme and Structure, Computers and the Humanities, 1989.
0.19 Thomas D. Bacig Robert H. Evans Donald W. Larmouth Kenneth C. Risdon, Beyond Argumentation and Comparison/Contrast: Extending the Socrates CAI Design Principles to Classroom Teaching and the Interpretation and Production of Other Forms of Discourse, Computers and the Humanities, 1990.
0.18 M. W. A. Smith, The Revenger's Tragedy: The Derivation and Interpretation of Statistical Results for Resolving Disputed Authorship, Computers and the Humanities, 1987.
0.18 David Huron, Error Categories Detection and Reduction in a Musical Database, Computers and the Humanities, 1988.
0.18 David A. Stech, A Computer-Assisted Approach to Micro-Analysis of Melodic Lines, Computers and the Humanities, 1981.
0.18 Spike L. Bucklow, A Stylometric Analysis of Craquelure, Computers and the Humanities, 1997.
0.18 R. E. Roberson James Pruett, Letters to the Editor, Computers and the Humanities, 1967.
0.17 Stephen Usher Dietmar Najock, A Statistical Study of Authorship in the Corpus Lysiacum, Computers and the Humanities, 1982.
0.17 , Errata: An Investigation of Morton's Method to Distinguish Elizabethan Playwrights, Computers and the Humanities, 1985.
0.17 Torma Suokko, , Computers and the Humanities, 1974.
0.17 M. A. Crerar, Elements of a Statistical Approach to the Question of Authorship in Music, Computers and the Humanities, 1985.
0.17 Nigel Nettheim, On the Accuracy of Musical Data with Examples from Gregorian Chant and German Folksong, Computers and the Humanities, 1993.
0.17 Walter D. Kamphoefner, , Computers and the Humanities, 1977.
0.17 M. W. A. Smith, An Investigation of Morton's Method to Distinguish Elizabethan Playwrights, Computers and the Humanities, 1985.
0.17 John Chadwick, , Computers and the Humanities, 1977.
0.17 David Graham, LetterPerfect and Thesaurus: Français and Français-Canada, Computers and the Humanities, 1991.
0.16 John R. Allen, , Computers and the Humanities, 1975.
0.16 Irwin Scollar, , Computers and the Humanities, 1979.
0.16 Howard P. Iker, SELECT: A Computer Program to Identify Associationally Rich Words for Content Analysis I Statistical Results, Computers and the Humanities, 1974.
0.16 Vern L. Bullough, The Computer and the Historian: Some Tentative Beginnings, Computers and the Humanities, 1967.
0.16 M. W. A. Smith, The Authorship of "A Lover's Complaint": An Application of Statistical Stylometry to Poetry, Computers and the Humanities, 1984.
0.16 T. R. Waldo, , Computers and the Humanities, 1972.
0.15 John Nerbonne Peter Kleiweg, Lexical Distance in LAMSAS, Computers and the Humanities, 2003.
0.15 David Herlihy, Algorithm to Study Manuscript Relationships, Computers and the Humanities, 1973.
0.15 Hans van Halteren, The Feasibility of Incremental Linguistic Annotation, Computers and the Humanities, 1998.