Citations to Women in Theory
After reading Kieran Healy’s latest post about women and citation patterns in philosophy, I wanted to revisit the co-citation graph I had made of five journals in literary and cultural theory. As I noted, one of these journals is Signs, which is devoted specifically to feminist theory. I didn’t think that its presence would skew the results too much, but I wanted to test it. Here are the top thirty citations in those five journals:
Butler J 1990 | 117 |
Jameson F 1981 | 90 |
Butler J 1993 | 72 |
Lacan J 1977 | 71 |
Derrida J 1978 | 64 |
Foucault M 1977 | 61 |
Chodorow Nancy 1978 | 60 |
Gilligan C 1982 | 60 |
Fish Stanley 1980 | 57 |
Foucault M 1978 | 56 |
Spivak G C 1988 | 54 |
Bhabha H K 1994 | 54 |
Derrida Jacques 1976 | 53 |
Benjamin W Illuminations | 53 |
Foucault M 1980 | 52 |
Althusser L 1971 | 51 |
Said Edward W 1978 | 51 |
DE Man P 1979 | 50 |
Foucault M 1979 | 49 |
Laclau Enesto 1985 | 48 |
Hardt M 2000 | 48 |
Zizek Slavoj 1989 | 47 |
Derrida Jacques 1994 | 46 |
Benjamin Walter 1969 | 45 |
Lyotard J-f 1984 | 44 |
Foucault Michel 1980 | 44 |
Anderson B 1983 | 44 |
Williams Raymond 1977 | 42 |
Frye Northrop 1957 | 41 |
Fuss D 1989 | 40 |
Irigaray L 1985 | 40 |
There are eight women (I’m counting Chantal Mouffe) in the top thirty, and Judith Butler is the most-cited author. To test my intuition that literary theory journals cite female authors more than analytic philosophy, I decided to replace Signs with College Literature. (Here is the co-citation network. Again, these work best with Safari and Chrome.)
Here are the top thirty most cited authors in that corpus:
Jameson F 1981 | 100 |
Lacan J 1977 | 75 |
Fish Stanley 1980 | 66 |
Derrida J 1978 | 65 |
Bhabha H K 1994 | 60 |
Benjamin W Illuminations | 59 |
Butler J 1990 | 57 |
Derrida Jacques 1976 | 57 |
Althusser L 1971 | 56 |
Bakhtin M M 1981 | 56 |
Foucault M 1977 | 56 |
DE Man P 1979 | 52 |
Lyotard J-f 1984 | 49 |
Zizek Slavoj 1989 | 48 |
Frye Northrop 1957 | 48 |
Derrida Jacques 1994 | 48 |
Foucault M 1979 | 48 |
Benjamin Walter 1969 | 48 |
Hardt M 2000 | 46 |
Anderson B 1983 | 44 |
Laclau Enesto 1985 | 43 |
Marx K Capital | 43 |
Said Edward W 1978 | 42 |
Gilroy P 1993 | 41 |
Barthes Roland 1977 | 41 |
Williams Raymond 1977 | 40 |
Freud S Interpretation Dream | 40 |
Jameson Fredric 1991 | 40 |
Culler Jonathan 1975 | 40 |
Bass Alan 1982 | 40 |
Derrida J 1981 | 39 |
Butler and Mouffe (whose name doesn’t appear because of the way the citation data is formatted) are the only women in the top thirty (unless I missed something!).
I don’t want to draw any major conclusions from this data, but I’m a bit surprised. Neither of these citation corpora have been cleaned up as much as Healy’s has, for instance, and the choice of journals clearly affects the outcome. The journals I chose were ones that I happened to think might be representative of literary theory and also happened to be in the Web of Science database; many obvious candidates were not.