inquiry critical winter autumn abbreviated professor response spring account summer trans claim chicago fact theory point made convention essay

0.35 Steven Knapp Walter Benn Michaels, Reply to George Wilson, Critical Inquiry, 1992.
0.32 Nelson Goodman, The Telling and the Told, Critical Inquiry, 1981.
0.32 Margaret Gilbert, Notes on the Concept of a Social Convention, New Literary History, 1983.
0.30 E. D. Hirsch_ Jr., Against Theory?, Critical Inquiry, 1983.
0.29 Steven Knapp Walter Benn Michaels, A Reply to Richard Rorty: What Is Pragmatism?, Critical Inquiry, 1985.
0.27 Walter Benn Michaels, The Shape of the Signifier, Critical Inquiry, 2001.
0.24 Jeffrey Wieand, Duchamp and the Artworld, Critical Inquiry, 1981.
0.23 Steven Knapp Walter Benn Michaels, Against Theory 2: Hermeneutics and Deconstruction, Critical Inquiry, 1987.
0.23 William C. Dowling, Intentionless Meaning, Critical Inquiry, 1983.
0.23 Steven Knapp Walter Benn Michaels, A Reply to Our Critics, Critical Inquiry, 1983.
0.23 Steven Mailloux, Convention and Context, New Literary History, 1983.
0.23 E. D. Hirsch_ Jr., Beyond Convention?, New Literary History, 1983.
0.22 P. D. Juhl, Do Computer Poems Show That an Author's Intention Is Irrelevant to the Meaning of a Literary Work?, Critical Inquiry, 1979.
0.22 Mark Roskill, A Reply to John Reichert and Stanley Fish, Critical Inquiry, 1979.
0.21 Peter J. Rabinowitz, Assuming the Obvious: A Reply to Derek Longhurst, Critical Inquiry, 1986.
0.21 Steven Knapp Walter Benn Michaels, Against Theory, Critical Inquiry, 1982.
0.21 John Reichert, Making Sense of Interpretation, Critical Inquiry, 1980.
0.20 John Reichert, But That Was in Another Ball Park: A Reply to Stanley Fish, Critical Inquiry, 1979.
0.20 , Editorial Note, Critical Inquiry, 2007.
0.19 Adena Rosmarin, On the Theory of "Against Theory", Critical Inquiry, 1983.
0.19 Stanley E. Fish, A Reply to John Reichert; Or How to Stop Worrying and Learn to Love Interpretation, Critical Inquiry, 1979.
0.18 Stanley E. Fish, One More Time, Critical Inquiry, 1980.
0.18 Laurent Stern, Reply to Professor Fain, New Literary History, 1990.
0.18 Stanley E. Fish, Interpreting "Interpreting the Variorum", Critical Inquiry, 1976.
0.18 Stanley Fish, Working on the Chain Gang: Interpretation in the Law and in Literary Criticism, Critical Inquiry, 1982.
0.17 Steven Knapp Walter Benn Michaels, Reply to John Searle, New Literary History, 1994.
0.17 Michael Fried, Response to Caroline A Jones, Critical Inquiry, 2001.
0.17 Claire Pentecost, Appetites/Sovereignty, Critical Inquiry, 2007.
0.17 Stanley Fish, Fear of Fish: A Reply to Walter Davis, Critical Inquiry, 1984.
0.17 Steven Mailloux, Truth or Consequences: On Being against Theory, Critical Inquiry, 1983.
0.16 Edward W. Said, Response to Stanley Fish, Critical Inquiry, 1983.
0.16 Robert Denham, The No-Man's Land of Competing Patterns, Critical Inquiry, 1977.
0.16 George M. Wilson, Again Theory: On Speaker's Meaning Linguistic Meaning and the Meaning of a Text, Critical Inquiry, 1992.
0.16 Walter Benn Michaels, The No-Drop Rule, Critical Inquiry, 1994.
0.15 Hayden White, Historical Pluralism, Critical Inquiry, 1986.
0.15 Stanley E. Fish, Normal Circumstances Literal Language Direct Speech Acts the Ordinary the Everyday the Obvious What Goes without Saying and Other Special Cases, Critical Inquiry, 1978.
0.15 Jay Schleusener, Convention and the Context of Reading, Critical Inquiry, 1980.
0.15 Quentin Bell, Reply to Jane Marcus, Critical Inquiry, 1985.
0.15 Richard Rorty, Philosophy without Principles, Critical Inquiry, 1985.
0.15 Stanley E. Fish, Facts and Fictions: A Reply to Ralph Rader, Critical Inquiry, 1975.
0.15 Douglas Bush, Professor Fish on the Milton "Variorum", Critical Inquiry, 1976.
0.15 , Addendum: Seven Notes for the Reconstruction of Sexuality, Social Text, 1983.
0.15 Ralph W. Rader, Explaining Our Literary Understanding: A Response to Jay Schleusener and Stanley Fish, Critical Inquiry, 1975.
0.14 Tracy B. Strong, When Is a Text Not a Pretext? A Rejoinder to Victoria Silver, Critical Inquiry, 1993.
0.14 John R. Searle, Structure and Intention in Language: A Reply to Knapp and Michaels, New Literary History, 1994.
0.14 Walter Benn Michaels, Is There a Politics of Interpretation?, Critical Inquiry, 1982.
0.14 Mary Louise Pratt, A Reply to Harold Fromm, Critical Inquiry, 1986.
0.14 Max Black, How Metaphors Work: A Reply to Donald Davidson, Critical Inquiry, 1979.
0.14 E. D. Hirsch_ Jr., Coming with Terms to Meaning, Critical Inquiry, 1986.
0.13 Menachem Brinker, On Realism's Relativism: A Reply to Nelson Goodman, New Literary History, 1983.
0.13 Stanley E. Fish, With the Compliments of the Author: Reflections on Austin and Derrida, Critical Inquiry, 1982.
0.13 Edwin Martin, On Seeing Walton's Great-Grandfather, Critical Inquiry, 1986.
0.13 Peter Brooks, Response to Charles Bernheimer, Critical Inquiry, 1991.
0.13 Jonathan Crewe, Toward Uncritical Practice, Critical Inquiry, 1983.
0.12 Jay Schleusener, Literary Criticism and the Philosophy of Science: Rader's "Fact Theory and Literary Explanation", Critical Inquiry, 1975.
0.12 Jerry R. Hobbs, Against Confusion, Diacritics, 1988.
0.12 Michael Fried, Response to Bill Brown, Critical Inquiry, 1992.
0.12 Stanley Fish, Consequences, Critical Inquiry, 1985.
0.12 Hayden White, Conventional Conflicts, New Literary History, 1981.
0.12 James R. Kincaid, Pluralistic Monism, Critical Inquiry, 1978.
0.11 Kendall L. Walton, Looking Again through Photographs: A Response to Edwin Martin, Critical Inquiry, 1986.
0.11 M. H. Abrams, V, Critical Inquiry, 2009.
0.11 Frank Kermode, A Reply to Denis Donoghue, Critical Inquiry, 1975.
0.11 Peter J. Rabinowitz, Who Was That Lady? Pluralism and Critical Method, Critical Inquiry, 1979.
0.11 Walter Benn Michaels, Political Science Fictions, New Literary History, 2000.
0.11 Michael Fried, III A Self-Correction, Critical Inquiry, 2008.
0.11 , Editorial Note, Critical Inquiry, 1989.
0.11 Stanley Cavell, A Reply to John Hollander, Critical Inquiry, 1980.
0.11 William Conger Thierry de Duve, Letters to the Editor, Critical Inquiry, 1999.
0.11 Donald Davidson, The Third Man, Critical Inquiry, 1993.
0.11 Lydia Davis, The Fish, boundary 2, 1985.
0.11 Harold Fromm, The Hegemonic Form of Othering; Or the Academic's Burden, Critical Inquiry, 1986.
0.11 Richard Moran, Seeing and Believing: Metaphor Image and Force, Critical Inquiry, 1989.
0.10 James R. Kincaid James Phelan, What Do We Owe Texts? Respect Irreverence or Nothing at All?, Critical Inquiry, 1999.
0.10 , Coupling, Critical Inquiry, 1998.
0.10 Haskell Fain, Some Comments on Stern's "Narrative versus Description in Historiography", New Literary History, 1990.
0.10 Joel Snyder Ted Cohen, Reflexions on "Las Meninas": Paradox Lost, Critical Inquiry, 1980.
0.10 James R. Kincaid, Coherent Readers Incoherent Texts, Critical Inquiry, 1977.
0.10 Wolfgang Iser, Talk like Whales: A Reply to Stanley Fish, Diacritics, 1981.
0.10 Nelson Goodman, Realism Relativism and Reality, New Literary History, 1983.